Home Page -- Products -- Order Now -- Download Issue -- Contact Us -- Search

SPECIALTY LAW - September, 2004 Environmental Law



CA Environmental Law Cases

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT -- EIR required to study impact on wildlife. Schmidt v. San Diego Unified Port District (Cal.App. 2005), No. D044671

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP -- Property buyer entitled to damages. Franklin Reinforcing Steel Co., Inc. v. Kruss (Cal.App. 2005), No. B167565

ENVIRONMENTAL PLAINTIFFS -- Attorney fees imposed properly. Proe v. City of Auburn (Cal.App. 2005), No. C047028

NOISE -- Proposed development will not exceed city's levels. Sycamore Gardens Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Tustin (Cal.App. 20095), No. G034044

SEWERS -- County complied with Kentucky's Eminent Domain Act. Golden Foods, LLC v. Louisville & Jefferson County Met. Sewer Dist. (Cal.App. 2005), No. 2004-CA-000688-MR



Home Page -- Products -- Order Now -- Download Issue -- Contact Us -- Search